AI Deployment Playbook: Avoiding the Mistakes That Sink ROI and Customer Trust

Written By Camille Stewart Gloster

Executives who want AI to deliver results must address data, governance, security, and workforce planning before scaling.

Executives who want AI to deliver results must address data, governance, security, and workforce planning before scaling. Missteps do not just waste money. They expand the attack surface, invite compliance failures, and erode the very trust that sustains customer relationships.

AI has moved from boardroom buzzword to business reality. Yet in the rush to deploy, too many organizations are making the same mistakes, turning what could be transformative tools into ticking time bombs.

Worse, in many cases AI is not just failing quietly. It is generating what Harvard Business Review calls workslop: a flood of AI-generated output that looks impressive in volume but destroys productivity in practice . Instead of making people more efficient, it buries them under low-quality drafts, repetitive content, and endless review cycles. When workslop is combined with weak governance, poor data practices, shadow AI, and untrained teams, it does more than waste time. It expands the threat surface, magnifies compliance gaps, and increases the likelihood of a cybersecurity incident.

AI is not plug and play. It is not an add-on to old systems. It is a catalyst for redesigning how your organization works, how your teams are structured, and how your customers experience your services. Ignore that, and you are not just wasting money. You are increasing risk.

Here are the most common mistakes I see, and why they matter.

AI Adoption Mistakes Every Executive Should Avoid

1. Not redesigning systems and processes.
Dropping AI into legacy workflows without re-engineering creates inefficiencies and security gaps. Controls built for pre-AI systems rarely protect model-driven processes, leaving room for insider risk and data leakage.

2. Not getting data in order.
Poor data quality, missing provenance, and siloed datasets cripple AI performance. They also expand the attack surface, since corrupted or poisoned data can silently compromise models .

3. Ignoring security.
Every AI system creates new vulnerabilities. Attackers are already exploiting prompt injection, model theft, data leakage, and adversarial manipulation . If security is not built in from day one, adversaries will find the blind spots.

4. Mishandling experimentation.
Experimentation is essential, but mishandled it becomes a liability. Three common failures are:

  • letting teams experiment with no guardrails,

  • skipping testing before deployment,

  • being so restrictive that employees move experimentation outside approved channels, creating shadow AI.

Shadow AI is particularly dangerous. It processes sensitive data with no oversight, multiplying compliance and cybersecurity risks.

5. Overlooking privacy, transparency, and accountability.
Customers and regulators care about how decisions are made and whether data is protected. Transparency allows companies to trace how a model reached its output and accountability ensures that humans remain responsible. Without both, companies expose themselves to reputational and regulatory harm .

6. Forgetting AI’s limitations.
AI is not thinking. Large language models are sophisticated pattern matchers, not cognitive agents. They cannot be accountable for their actions. Anything requiring empathy, nuance, ethical judgment, or high-stakes decision-making must keep a human in the loop. Failure to do so creates both ethical and security risks, since adversaries exploit gaps left by automation without oversight.

7. Mishandling the workforce.
Too many leaders treat AI as a replacement rather than an enabler. In reality, AI shifts which skills matter. Without workforce planning to upskill, right-skill, and redeploy talent, organizations not only lose productivity gains but also drive employees toward insecure, unsanctioned tools.

8. Underestimating change management.
Even the most capable AI system fails if employees do not understand or trust it. Poor adoption often leads to insecure shortcuts and shadow AI, which raise both business and security risks.

9. Chasing hype instead of value.
Too many companies start with “We need AI” instead of “What problem are we solving?” This is how they end up with chatbots no one uses and automation that slows rather than speeds.

This is where workslop shows up. HBR defines it as the flood of AI-generated output that looks productive but delivers little value . Rather than streamline workflows, it forces employees to spend more time editing and cleaning up. MIT Media Lab found that 95 percent of organizations see no measurable return on generative AI investments.

The scale of this problem is visible in the numbers. In 2025, 42 percent of enterprises scrapped most of their AI initiatives, up from just 17 percent the year before, largely due to poor planning and weak data foundations. Beyond wasted productivity, all that workslop creates new storage and monitoring burdens, which increase the attack surface for data exfiltration and compliance violations.

10. Not training teams on proper use and limitations.
Without training, employees treat AI like an oracle. This increases the risk of data leaks, misuse, and overreliance on flawed outputs. Training is one of the strongest security and risk controls an organization can deploy.

11. Skipping vendor assessment.
Vendors often make polished promises. Without a structured assessment methodology, companies outsource both capability and risk, often to opaque systems with unknown vulnerabilities. RAND research shows that more than 80 percent of AI projects fail, roughly double the rate of traditional IT initiatives. Vendor hype without scrutiny is a gamble that undermines trust and ROI.

12. Forgetting the customer.
AI should improve the customer experience in marketing, communications, and service. When companies prioritize novelty over empathy, they alienate the very people they are trying to serve. In sensitive sectors, that erosion of trust often translates directly into lost revenue and regulatory scrutiny.

13. Ignoring the velocity of change.
AI evolves at warp speed. Even the best engineers are learning new things every day. Organizations that do not embed continuous learning into their culture fall behind and miss emerging risks, leaving adversaries one step ahead.

14. Having no AI use policy, or not enforcing it.
Yes, it is 2025, and I still see companies with no AI use policy. Others draft policies but never operationalize them. This is a governance and security failure. Policies must be enforced through monitoring, audits, and access controls.

15. Lacking cross-functional AI governance.
AI is not just a technical issue. It touches legal, HR, compliance, operations, and customer service. If governance does not bring these perspectives together, blind spots are guaranteed, and blind spots are where adversaries thrive.

These mistakes rarely exist in isolation. They often collide in practice. Take “vibe coding,” where engineers build AI tools with no guardrails, no transparency, and no alignment with business or workforce planning. The result is shadow AI projects, security gaps, unclear accountability, and customer confusion. That is not innovation. That is risk multiplied.

So how do you avoid these traps? Start with intention. Redesign processes before deploying models. Modernize your data. Train your teams. Establish guardrails. Create governance that includes every function, not just IT. And always keep humans in the loop for decisions that require judgment, empathy, or nuance.

The lesson is consistent: avoiding these mistakes is not only about reducing risk. It is about protecting business value.

Missteps erode efficiency, inflate costs, and weaken resilience. They expand the attack surface, invite compliance violations, and chip away at customer trust. Ultimately, all of that shows up on the bottom line.

The velocity of change in AI is also unprecedented. To some degree, everyone is learning as they go and adapting to new capabilities and new information. That is exactly why it is so important to set a solid foundation now. The foundation must contemplate what we already know about AI’s risks and limitations while remaining agile enough to adapt to a landscape that is evolving daily. Organizations that achieve this balance will be the ones that capture real ROI and maintain the trust of their customers.

That is my list. What about you? What mistakes have you seen in the rush to deploy AI, or what concerns keep you up at night?

For those who want to dive deeper on the research

This article was originally published on Command Line with Camille. For more insights on AI, security, and the evolving digital landscape, follow the series for regular updates and analysis.

Camille Stewart Gloster
Next

Cyber Resilience in Action: How Airports Kept Flying Through a Ransomware Attack